The sources document that his (primary) target seemed to be to finance 'himself' and his life-style and that he invested money (of unknown source) mainly in the general market - like everybody would do to "store" your money if you don't want to pile cash in your drawer ('Financier' would be a person whose (primary) occupation is either facilitating or directly providing investments to companies and businesses.).- BalancedIssues ( talk) 08:53, 25 July 2019 (UTC) How about the following start of the lede: Jeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953) is an American registered sex offender. Latest sources also make it very questionable whether Epstein's was a 'financier'. Latest filings of his lawyers already showed that he is definitively not a 'billionaire'. Is there any opposition to omitting "financier" is the lede? At least a hint in the lede that according to sources this is an image that Epstein paid to be promoted about himself?Īccording to latest sources it was mainly Epstein himself who promoted his image as 'billionaire financier' and he paid several journalists to paint this image what wouldn't be necessary if he was a real billionaire financier. Some editors argued for omitting "unnecessary" facts in the lede (and to have those in the article text).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |